📡

GEO Content Analyzer & Agent-Readiness Checker

Free GEO Agent-Readiness Checker and LLM page analyser. Audit any URL against 26 AI-search signals across GEO, AEO and SEO, then get a prioritised fix list to win citations on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity.

GEO·OPTIMIZER · algo v1.0 · 26 signals · runs in your browser
◢ URL MODE ◢ PASTE HTML try: wikipedia· mdn docs
GET
brand
URL mode fetches the served HTML through this site's own server (SSRF-safe). If a site blocks it, switch to PASTE HTML.

A free GEO Agent-Readiness Checker — also known as a GEO page analyser or LLM content audit tool. Paste a URL (or raw HTML) above and the agent renders the page, splits it by section, and audits each one against 26 deterministic GEO, AEO and SEO signals. The output is a composite LLM-Ready score, three per-engine sub-scores, and a prioritised fix list ranked by impact. No signup, no rate limits, no data leaves your browser.

GEO / LLM-Ready Score

composite index
,
/ 100
awaiting
GEO generative,
AEO answer engine,
SEO traditional,

Agent Console

// idle, enter a URL and hit analyze
Dimension Breakdown
Section-by-Section Evaluation
Prioritized Suggestions
▢ No analysis yet.
Feed a URL or paste HTML, the agent renders the DOM, evaluates every content section, and assigns an LLM-Ready score against the 26-signal benchmark.
Methodology

How the GEO Agent-Readiness Checker scores your page

GEO Agent-Readiness measures how well an AI agent — like ChatGPT's retrieval pipeline, Perplexity's source ranker, or Google's AI Overview generator — can extract, attribute and cite a section of your page. Traditional SEO checks whether a page can rank on a SERP. This GEO page analyser audits whether each individual section can be lifted as a citable passage by an LLM.

The audit runs entirely in your browser. The tool parses the live DOM, slices it on H2/H3 boundaries, then evaluates 26 deterministic signals across 7 weighted dimensions. No model calls, no signup, no rate limits.

Alignment18%

Does the page actually answer the question the LLM was asked? H1 reframed as a claim, brand bound to the topic, intent-format match.

Substance22%

Is the content dense with extractable facts? Numeric-claim density, named-entity density, no unbacked superlatives, a liftable definition lead.

Architecture16%

Can the page be sliced into independent retrievable chunks? Modular block skeleton, standalone subheading leads, clean H1→H2→H3 hierarchy.

Style8%

Is the prose easy for both humans and machines to consume? Assertive (claim-style) headings, concise sentences ≤22 words on average.

Framing14%

Is content shaped for the queries AI engines surface? User-phrased FAQ, answer-first responses, comparative framing, lists / steps / tables.

Proof14%

Is there evidence the LLM can cite and a human can verify? Dated proof points, first-party research, third-party authority, attributed quotes.

Technical8%

Does the page meet the crawler basics? Title / meta hygiene, JSON-LD schema, alt text on images, internal linking, canonical + og:type.

What this LLM page analyser is good for

  • Pre-publish QA — drop a draft URL in, fix every "Needs fix" signal before going live.
  • Competitive teardown — paste a competitor's HTML and see exactly why their page is being cited.
  • Editorial standards — use the 26 signals as a content brief checklist so every page ships GEO-ready.
  • Migration audits — run the same URL on staging and production to compare the GEO/AEO/SEO scores after a redesign.

How GEO Agent-Readiness differs from a traditional SEO audit

An SEO audit tells you why a page won't rank. A GEO page analyser tells you why an LLM won't cite it. The signals overlap on technical basics (single H1, schema, canonicals), but diverge sharply on content shape: entity density, claim-style headings, liftable first sentences, comparative framing and verifiable proof are where GEO scores diverge from traditional SEO. A page can score 90+ on a Lighthouse SEO check and still be invisible inside ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity answers — that gap is what this tool measures.

Frequently asked

FAQs about the GEO Content Analyzer & Agent-Readiness Checker

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the practice of optimising content to be selected, quoted and recommended inside AI answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. Traditional SEO optimises for ranking blue links; GEO optimises for being the source the model cites. This tool scores both, plus AEO (answer-engine / featured-snippet readiness).
GEO Agent-Readiness measures how well an AI agent — like ChatGPT’s retrieval pipeline, Perplexity’s source ranker or Google’s AI Overview generator — can extract, attribute and cite a section of your page. A GEO Agent-Readiness Checker like this one audits each individual section of the page (not just the page as a whole) and reports whether it can be lifted as a citable passage by an LLM.
It runs 26 deterministic signals across 7 weighted dimensions: Alignment (18%), Substance (22%), Architecture (16%), Style (8%), Framing (14%), Proof (14%) and Technical & Crawl (8%). Each signal returns a 0–100 score with a plain-English explanation of what was detected and a fix to apply. The composite is your LLM-Ready score; you also get separate GEO, AEO and SEO sub-scores.
The tool renders the page, then evaluates it against the 26 signals. Each signal returns a 0–100 score; dimensions are weighted (Substance 22%, Alignment 18%, and so on) into one composite index, plus separate GEO, AEO and SEO sub-scores. Fixes are ranked by impact — the gap on each signal multiplied by the dimension’s weight — so the top suggestion is always the highest-leverage one.
An SEO audit tells you why a page won’t rank. A GEO page analyser tells you why an LLM won’t cite it. The signals overlap on technical basics (single H1, schema, canonicals) but diverge sharply on content shape: entity density, claim-style headings, liftable first sentences, comparative framing and verifiable proof. A page can pass Lighthouse SEO and still be invisible inside ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity answers.
No. Paste-HTML mode runs entirely in your browser. URL mode fetches the page through this site’s own server-side proxy purely to bypass CORS — the HTML is analysed in your browser and nothing is stored.
Some sites block automated fetches or require JavaScript to render. If a URL returns empty or blocked, open the page, use View Source, copy the HTML, and switch to PASTE HTML mode for an exact analysis.
Beyond tools
Need an audit, not a checker?
These tools spot problems. I solve them. Book a free strategy call, I'll review your site live and give you a prioritised fix list.