GEO Content Checker & Audit Tool
Free GEO content checker and audit tool. This GEO Content Analyzer runs an agent-readiness audit on any URL, scoring it against 26 AI-search signals across GEO, AEO and SEO, then hands you a prioritised fix list to win citations on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity.
Frequently asked
FAQs about the GEO Content Checker & Audit Tool
A GEO content checker is a free tool that scores a web page on how well AI search engines can read, trust and cite it. Paste a URL and this checker audits the page against 26 GEO, AEO and SEO signals, then returns an LLM-Ready score with a ranked fix list. Unlike a keyword-density SEO checker, a GEO content checker measures whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews will actually quote your page.
A GEO content audit reviews seven weighted dimensions: Alignment, Substance, Architecture, Style, Framing, Proof and Technical. Across those it runs 26 checks (entity density, claim-style headings, liftable first sentences, comparative framing, dated proof and schema) and scores each 0 to 100. You get a composite LLM-Ready score plus separate GEO, AEO and SEO sub-scores, so the audit doubles as an AI visibility checker and an LLM SEO checker.
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the practice of optimising content to be selected, quoted and recommended inside AI answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. Traditional SEO optimises for ranking blue links; GEO optimises for being the source the model cites. This tool scores both, plus AEO (answer-engine / featured-snippet readiness).
GEO Agent-Readiness measures how well an AI agent can extract, attribute and cite a section of your page. Agents like ChatGPT’s retrieval pipeline, Perplexity’s source ranker and Google’s AI Overview generator all work this way. A GEO Agent-Readiness Checker like this one audits each individual section of the page (not just the page as a whole) and reports whether it can be lifted as a citable passage by an LLM.
It runs 26 deterministic signals across 7 weighted dimensions: Alignment (18%), Substance (22%), Architecture (16%), Style (8%), Framing (14%), Proof (14%) and Technical & Crawl (8%). Each signal returns a 0–100 score with a plain-English explanation of what was detected and a fix to apply. The composite is your LLM-Ready score; you also get separate GEO, AEO and SEO sub-scores.
The tool renders the page, then evaluates it against the 26 signals. Each signal returns a 0–100 score; dimensions are weighted (Substance 22%, Alignment 18%, and so on) into one composite index, plus separate GEO, AEO and SEO sub-scores. Fixes are ranked by impact (the gap on each signal multiplied by the dimension’s weight), so the top suggestion is always the highest-leverage one.
An SEO audit tells you why a page won’t rank. A GEO content checker tells you why an LLM won’t cite it. The signals overlap on technical basics (single H1, schema, canonicals) but diverge sharply on content shape: entity density, claim-style headings, liftable first sentences, comparative framing and verifiable proof. A page can pass Lighthouse SEO and still be invisible inside ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity answers.
No. Paste-HTML mode runs entirely in your browser. URL mode fetches the page through this site’s own server-side proxy purely to bypass CORS, and the HTML is analysed in your browser and nothing is stored.
Some sites block automated fetches or require JavaScript to render. If a URL returns empty or blocked, open the page, use View Source, copy the HTML, and switch to PASTE HTML mode for an exact analysis.
Beyond tools
Need an audit, not a checker?
These tools spot problems. I solve them. Book a free strategy call, I'll review your site live and give you a prioritised fix list.